Arthur Miller’s Commentary Essay

Arthur Millers r set asideering helps our understanding of the play very much. Through more(prenominal) character level he has made it possible for us to understand exactly how the diverse characters ar feeling, and why they behave the way they do, as in the eggshell of Abigail using the livelong situation to her advantage, and being very manipulative and sly, whole of which ar characteristics that we dont like in ourselves. For example, Abigail was using the whole situation to get back at bum follow, she wanted him and he didnt want her, and in trying to gain his affections, she k nonty all of the people of Salem. During the play Abigail had one goal (to get illusion Proctor) and she didnt care how she achieved this.Through come in the play the contrast between heat and dark is a prominent feature. In the footnote at the plead of act one Miller has used the image of light on that point is a narrow window at the left. Through its take pains the morning sunlight strea ms. A candle still burn near the bed The room gives of an air of clean spareness. This symbolises that everything is OK, there are no bad things happening. Light end-to-end the play is use to interpret good. As the legend line continues the mood and til now the scenes themselves become darker and more evil, even the weather becomes more negative and depressing. Dark is used throughout the play to symbolise bad. For example, the courtroom is always dark there are no open windows and no candles. In some cases certain characters produce light into a scene that was dark, like John Proctor. But when he is accused of magnetizecraft the light that accompanies him became a lot dimmer.I as well as mean Arthur Miller makes it very easy for us to pick out good and bad characters at the beginning of the play. But some of the characters bedevil sides as the play goes on, at the beginning of the play I rig Reverend Hale was very annoying. However as the play demonstrable he was one of the people who could see sense in the situation. Towards the end of the play you could tell which characters were good, and which were bad.Arthur Miller also puts the auditory sense in a very annoying position because we can see how wrong and how ridiculous the characters are being. The audience would get very angry at the item that only John Proctor and Mr Hale can see sense, even though it takes two acts for them to see it. An example of this would be John Proctors reaction to Abigail stumbling in with a needle in her stomach, claiming that John Proctors wife is a voodoo witch. Why she through with(p) it herself I hope you arent takin it for proof, Mister. Abigail claims this to get back at John Proctor the audience however are led to imagine that she did it to herself, even though it is not actually said in the text.all(a) of this would make the audience very angry, and would make us start to think why the characters arent doing anything about it. In this case Im going to po int out Judge Danforth because he is so imprisoned up in his own little world and doing what he thinks is right on. At first Danforth only frustrated me with his ignorance, however as the written report line developed I found my frustration upseting to temper and my anger into hate. Abby also frustrated me because she twisted the situation for her own receipts and to get at John ProctorAt the end of to each one act Miller leaves the play in a state of climax. At the end of act one Miller draws the curtain on the girls firing frantic and false accusations of witchcraft against many women in Salem, act three ends with the dramatic exit of Mr Hale I grass over these proceedings, I quit this court Through this approach it always keeps the audience on the edge of their seats.It keeps the audience swept up in the story line, almost like a soap opera today, where each contingency ends with a dramatic last scene (cliff hanger), and ensuring they watch the next fact because they want to know what happens, I find it very frustrating. In fact, The crucible is very analogous to a modern day soap opera, in that its success as a whole depends on how involved the viewers, or audience, become with the characters and the story line.I also think that because it is based on history, the story might not be true to word, which adds fascination. The play was not only written to record historical events in Salem but was also written to warn people of modern day witch hunts, such as the McCarthy witch hunt (1950s) in which people were asked to turn in anyone who was a Communist at the time. The naming and shaming followed a similar pattern of that in Salem.