Leadership Case Study: Steve Jobs Essay

1. Steve Jobs had an extremely soaringer(prenominal) interest in being in charge, so to start off with his attractor-follower element, he roughly definitely settles in m send a port on the leader end of the spectrum. Jobs was so far in the lead end of the spectrum that he had actu completelyy been removed from his chief executive officer position in 1985 for being unmanage suitable. being one(a) of the intimately(prenominal) charismatic leaders in the labor has helped him develop his leaders traits through his time with orchard apple tree, NeXT, and Pixar. He has of each time been determined even when apple took him exploit up of the equation, where he went off to ground sightly about of our childhood staples such as encounter Story and gained an enormous shargon of assembly line with Disney, which was actu totallyy more than he everlastingly have goted with apple. His bewitch spans across tailfin different industries, which is more than closely both CE O can say that they need done in their entire life. His influence spanned across the com swaner industry, Hollywood and the picture industry, the wireless phone industry with the IPhone, the retail industry, and my personal favorite being the practice of medicine industry where ITunes has innovated the very distribution of euphony itself.To the point, Steve evermore seemed to get what he precious when it came to influencing these many an(prenominal) industries. As for musical arrangemental objectives, Jobs unceasingly valued to work a ingathering that the customer wishinged but almost didnt even k flat they cute or conceive the product in a thought, the IPod being a primary coil example of this. If Jobs didnt crack care the publication of a product, he sent it jeopardize to the draught board. Jobs and his members divided up the goals to bring forth recent things they wanted, in the hopes that the customer would too. Change is a huge aspect of the way Jobs leads, all he wants to do is create technologically changing products that he and his customers in reality want. The constantly updating technology, yet always user friendly interface is Apples motto now a days. Steves people skills were on the face of it non the greatest, but as foresightful as a subordinate shared in his vision of wanting to create and innovate like he did, hence Apple would succeed. His people tended to revere him for the way he went about inventing new products and neer wanting to fall short on anything.2. The leadership skills that Steve Jobs possessed that made himself as well as his companies so made were due his combination of the technical, interpersonal, and decision-making skills he possessed. care up with the latest technology in the tech industry is an absolute necessity, and Steve and Apple not only kept up with the industry but innovated it any quantity of the way, so his technical skills were very of the essence(predicate). Steves interpe rsonal skills were not conventional in the regular scent out of the meaning, but he had his own way of developing relationships and gaining the respect of his subordinates who wished to share in his vision of self-aggrandizing people products that they didnt even joc blusher they wanted. He was reliable to consistently cash in ones chips this point to his employees, and motivating was one of his linchpin qualities, such as in his key tint speeches to his customers to unveil new products every year.Lastly, and what I believe to be his most important skill that he possesses, is his decision-making skills. Jobs was able to come back to Apple and make the necessary decisions to bring it out of unsuccessful person by changing the corporate assimilation back to an entrepreneurial environment to be the in advance(p) guild it once was. little thinking was a big demote of his life, and Steve was effn to take walks alone in an almost trance like nation where he would be identify ing problems and changes in the industry, know where opportunities lied, and would critically think to come up with creative ideas to be the leader and groundbreaker in so many industries.3. chthonic the interpersonal managerial leadership functions section, I believe that Steve fell under the kin of figurehead and leader roles in this section. Steve was the go to speaker at the key note speeches of unveiling products, and he always had a sense of spirit about him that really made the customer believe in how frequently he loves the product they just unveiled, and how much Steve believed that the customer would love the product. Steve withal continuously performed the leader role by giving instructions of the creation of products, why the confederation should head in a certain direction, or evaluating performance of investigate and development of new products. If Steve didnt want to personally use it, chances are it was impel in the trash and it was back to the drawing board. As far as the informational role category, I believe that Steve was in the supervise role as well as the spokesperson role. Steve was constantly gathering information and attending meetings in and out of the administration to create new and innovative products.As for the spokesperson role, as I clear stated previously, he was the charismatic leader that was the face and spirit of what Apple was all about, and he had the customer locomote in love with a completely innovative product before they had seen anything like it before. As far as his decisional role, he was the communitys main entrepreneur as well as the main stochasticity handler when Apple came to him on the verge of bankruptcy. New and im turn out products and services is Apples core belief give thanks to Jobs, and his combination of these two roles saved the company single handed thanks to Steves enthusiasm and lovemaking of innovation. His decisional roles that he compete were by far his most important con tributions since he not only saved the company from bankruptcy but withal made it the innovative leader in technology for the last 20 years.4. The primary level of analysis that this case focuses on is the organizational level of analysis. The focus is on how Steve Jobs can influence the entire organization of people to get on exonerate of their game and to constantly be flavor for change to innovate new products. He influenced the behaviors, work ethic, and productivity of all of his employees. He individually was able to completely turn the company around from bankruptcy because of the tactic he would use to influence perfection. His principal set was one way, always towards the attached best product, and if he didnt like it then the idea was scrapped. While whatever of his employees did not quite agree with the groundless fits that Steve would have, even the employees that ended up quitting chill out said there was a sense of respect for what Steve was doing and his pass ion for it. Steves passion resonated throughout the entire organization, and the simple point that his views of how the innovation culture at the study helped save it from bankruptcy shows his abilities. Saving Apple was not an easy task, but he was able to accomplish it.5. The four leadership theory classifications that apply to this case are trait, behavior, contingency, and integrative. Steves trait paradigm involves how he acts in the environment of the organization, which included high energy levels at work whether it was rage or passion. It too included his appearance, which he appeared as an angry guy who wanted nothing but perfection, but also showed passion through it all. He was always able to persuade in his own ways, and he always showed his dominance in the workplace, which unfortunately ended up in his initial removal from Apple, but proved extremely useful in his subsequent years. The behavior paradigm applied in the way that Steve was extremely focuse on cer tain tasks at hand, and the way he is always the biggest critic of any and all products being proposed or worked on in the company.The way that Steve Jobs contributed behaviorally in this case was by controlling his subordinates and demanding perfection every stones throw of the way. The contingency paradigm shows that leadership musical mode is situational, and even though people tended to shun the way Jobs lead, he ran the organization into its most successful and profitable years, saving it from demise. The most relevant paradigm in my feeling is the integrative paradigm. Since it incorporates portions from the other three theories, I believe that it can be used to describe the charismatic, passion filled leadership qualities that Jobs possessed. He was able to inspire his employees and everyone was always enthusiastic once the levels of productivity they had put in resulted in a renowned product everyone will love.6. Since the passing of Steve Jobs, this seems to be a quest ion that is on everyones mind, from employee to shareholder to customer. While it is a scary thought, something tells me that the passion and vision that Jobs was able to give to the organization in the last ten he worked their contributed to the current mentality of a lot of the current go along level managers still working there. It has become an atmosphere at Apple that they should only create products that would be worthy of a Jobs cast of characters of approval, and I personally do not think the organizational paradigm would pocket after such an influential benevolent being has put so much effort and soul into a company as Steve has done for Apple. Apple is the spark advance household name for so many different technologies, they have changed the music industry forever, and have an absolutely absurd step of cash on hand to ancestry whatever types of projects they need to be sure they are constantly on top of the industry. While the technology industry is one of the mos t fast paced changing industries with constant improvements in hardware and software, I do not see Apple falling behind to the point that they will not recover again.