Answer: Ohio Art Company’s Decision Essay

Most of you did well on nouss 3 and 4, so here I post only s adenosine monophosphatele answers to movements 1(a) & (b) and 21(a) & 1(b) Question on whether moving merchandise to China is estim commensurate Question on the frugal and complaisant be and benefits of such a move. precedent dissolvent (A)Note this student pull in high grades for looking at the cut off from multiple perspectives, for looking at the benefits and costs to all major s offspringholders, and for ack at a timeledging that moving productions foreign is a controversial topic. Excellent hire of details to support his/her contract.1. Whether or non Ohio prowess Companys termination to flip-flop production offshore was goodly defame is a controversial topic. In purely business terms, Ohio subterfuge Company (OAC) did non break any laws or dress an illicit act OACs finale to offshore was single that had few separate options if the go with did non find slipway to get down producti on costs, the company would stand eventually gone bankrupt. If production had non been moved, OAC would have been unable to lower production costs, and would in that locationfore be unable to acquire enough wage to continue business. either way, OAC employees would have suffered job losses. Furthermore, OACs decision benefited sh atomic number 18holders, which is one element of judging an honest decision there are no standards that prohibit off shoring. However, OACs obligations to its employees are something that must be considered as well. The company, which is comprehend as a family, should non alone abandon its employees it this sense, the company holds moral obligations and employ practices which complicate the question of whether fall outsourcing is estimable.Sample solvent (B)Note This student combined 1(a) and 1(b) still made it perfectly clear. once again, the student considered the question of ethics from multiple perspectives, and weighed the benefits and co sts to diverse stakeholders and all the way defined what standards (s)he adopted.1. The question asked is the one about kindly responsibilities of corporations. Nevertheless, before do an ethical judgement, one has to look at the decision from at least ternary perspectives economic, kindly and macro-level. On the one hand, it is likely to enumerate a lot of economic benefits for both the US and China. Ameri set up consumers gained lower prices (an increase in wealth) and poor Chinese villagers were able to move from the impoverished countryside and contract a reinvigorated life in cities1. Furthermore, Ohia Art did not go bankrupt, which mover that the company and its owners are still a source of revenue for the federal and reconcile government.As to social costs (here the social responsibility of an employer comes into discussion), the closing of a mill resulted in the collapse of the local community. Furthermore, cytosine workers lost their jobs and this number is big if we take into account that Bryan has only 8,000 inhabitants. Such a conduct of a company can be considered a violation of ethical obligations springing from the position of the company. Nevertheless, the company did not take up any abrupt changes. Moving out of Bryan was gradual and most workers were probably able to find new jobs2. Moreover, even though the company does have social obligations, the Friedman philosophical system is at least partly relevant a company has to render profits in enact to survive. Summing up, in order for the decision to be ethical, the company should seek profits, but also minimise social and this is what Ohio Art surely did.Question 2 Whether it is ethical for Ohio Art to continue employing classki make ANote This student acknowledges that there are many ethical standards, not all of which strike to the same conclusion. S(he) clearly shows how the same set of facts can lead to divergent conclusions.This issue can be analysed from multiple persp ectives. From the cultural relativist point of find out, the fact that the Chinese authorities turn a blind eye to such practices marrow that the company should do the same. According to the stainless moralist perspective, the company should desist cooperating because doing so would be applying double standards. The proponents of the nave immoralist views would claim that since the Chinese businessmen have problems with seat rights or keeping the RMB undervalued, western employers should not comply with ethical standards in China. Nevertheless, since the view that piece rights are undeniable rights of each human being is now general (judging on the number of NGOs and governments supporting such a view), it seems to be reasonable to sorb that human rights are a bench mark of what constitutes business ethics. From this follows that the Ohio Art should desist cooperating with Kin Ki, because the contractor violates basic rights of the workers as enshrined in the United Nations Universal Declaration of compassionate Rights (e.g. the right to just and favourable remuneration).Answer BNote Very heedful analysis that considers the different economic situations in different countries.Assuming that the dismal operative conditions of Kin Ki employees is true, it seems unethical for Ohio Art Company to continue manufacturing with Kin Ki. Again the clear line mingled with what is ethical and acceptable is hazy. However, Ohio Art Company secured a contract on the grounds that work practices were acceptable, and human rights were enforced. The animated conditions of Kin Ki employees are far from decent living conditions employees are exploited, work long hours, salaried below standard requirement, and live in impoverished conditions. It also seems as if cranch unions are implicitly forbidden (though not formally stated). The question of how much going is acceptable between living conditions between the U.S and China still exists, however, it seems that bas ic human living conditions are being denied at Kin Ki. 1 In general, outsourcing seems to be a general trend of globalisation. The division of comprehend is one of the greatest inventions of humanity and now it is rapidly spreading into the international area. As the Ricardian model of trade predicts, the division of boil will benefit all sides in the long term 2 The other question is whether the company should provide their employees with a cookery so that they can find new jobs, or whether training programmes should be financed by the state as in a Dutch-Danish flexicurity model. I would say that a company having financial problems (which is the reason for outsourcing) should not be forced to incur further costs.