'History of film in Latin America Essay\r'

'Film is a medium of amusement where sequence of images is projected on a screenland creating an illusion of movement (Parkinson, 24). Film industry started in 19th century as a shot of entertainment, communication and potbelly media. The motion pictures technology had a great impact on politics and fiat at large (Ibid, 45). Latin the States is the expanse in Central and S turn outh the States. The region has 21 countries with the main languages existence Spanish, French and Portuguese. Main races that consume the regions atomic number 18 Amevidians, who ar absolute majority in Bolivia and Peru African, Asians, Caucasians, Mestizos, Mulletoes and Zambos.\r\n just about of Latin the Statesns ar Christian and mostly Catholic Christian . Latin the States has a several(a) culture, but generally, the Latin America culture is influenced by Africa culture especially in Brazil, Venezuela, Columbia, Haiti, Cuba and Costa Rica. atomic number 63 culture which were mainly brought by Spanish, Portuguese and French. And the inhering culture of passel who inhabited the continent earlier to arrival of Europeans (Parkinson, 61). Latin America has liberal and divers(a) exposure industry. The industry started in mid(prenominal) twentieth century as entertainment tool. Mexicans, Brazilian, Cubans and Argentineans declargon rich hi write up in bucking.\r\nThey have as well make significant step in development of charter industry. In genus Argentina, cinema become prominent in low half of twentieth C, however, it suffered during the 1976- 83 phalanx tyranny (Parkinson, 36). But the industry re-emerged and even produced the academy award winner, the authoritative story in 1985. In Brazil, cinemas and motion pictures become important tools in the society, in mid 20th century. Cuban cinema overly create tremendously especially after it enjoyed government confirm since the Cuban gyration. They have produced important film-makers like Tomas Gutierrez Alea .\r\nMexican cinema in the g hoaryen era of mid-forties greatly boasted the film industry. Mexican films have standard recognition world over (Ibid, 54). Beside film being use as an entertainment tool, it has as well been used as mass media tool to shape the governmental order in many Latin America countries. Political struggle to have government treasure the citizen declines were mainly carried done the film medium. Latin America experienced many putsch detats and revolution in stolon half of 20th century as mountain struggle for liberty and dear which they were denied by the repressing governmental sciences (Missing).\r\nCinema and print media was used to forestall muckle to demand for their man rights and peach against uncouthty by the repressive governments. Repression is control by holding the sketch down. It amounts to forced subjugation (The Official Story). Human rights and emancipation argon basic rights to which all forgiving beings are entit conduct to. They include well-behaved, governmental, cultural, and economic rights. Examples of human rights and exemption includes right to carriage, right to liberty, freedom of discourseion, freedom from contrast on any basis, freedom of assembly and association, freedom of worship and right of owning property etc.\r\n umpteen of semi policy-making regimes in Latin America countries in early 20th century denied their citizen their basic rights. This precipitated revolution and neighborly- semi semipolitical struggles most of which were met with crude repression (Men with Guns). Artist and film-maker, used cinemas, depictions to transport the people’s call for their polite rights. publications artist also used their skills and knowledge to express the people’s call for their rights. One of the crush film work set is Latin America that depict the political situation that was in 20th century is ‘Missing’.\r\nThe movie was first released in 1987 in US and was directed by Costa-Gavras. It is a business officeful political sport that revolve some the life before and after a 1973 coup is a south American †dry land (even though the movies does non reveal it refers to the cayenne) which was very vaporizable the movie capture the who whole situation as it was, inflexible curfews, armed police terrosing people, many people constraining to 30,000 being killed, mass kidnapping, torture and ‘ fade’ of people who were considered leaning to precedent regime (Missing).\r\nThe movie is ground on a true story of an America-activist and author Charles Horman who disappeared in Chile at the height of America-backed violent war machine coup in 1978 (). This story was also in a book by doubting Thomas Hauser. The film focuses on struggle of Horman wife Beth ( queen Spacek) and cautious father End Horman (Jack Lemman) as they search for Charles. The film vividly show how the oppressive persuasion multitude junta o ppressed people in the streets, both Sissy speak and her farther-in-law were stonewalled not only(prenominal) as the ruling military but also the America consulate (Missing).\r\nThey only leant ulterior that the American government had been betraying their effort to risk Charles and that America government was friendly to the South America tyrant. Violation of human rights and repression is clearly drive home where the military dictator impose curfew and torture to all those who speak against the civil strife which was perpetuated by the ruling junta (Ibid,) The US government which also played come upon role in the coup also is nifty to muffle all voices that were against the forced takeover.\r\nThis is seen as the American embassy betrayed Ed (jack) and Beth (Sissy)’s effort to find and comprise with Charles. Media and press freedom was suppressed as the writers and journalists were not allowed to cover the killings, torture, raping and kidnapping. Freedom of movemen t was denied as 24 hours curfew are apply, on that point was gross invasion of human right as people were butchered, kidnapped, jailed and women sacked (). Violence existed as there was military and shogunate regime which disposed the civil government led by twice-elected Salvador Allende.\r\nPresident Salvador Allende led a collectivist regime which the US government was keen to gear up it so on to reduce the spread of socialism in the western world. The effort of CIA to block chairwoman Allende to vie for the second term by diffusion propagandas and supporting dissidents to oppose Allende’s government also was a major driver that plugged Chile to civil strife. Violence is perpetrated by corrupt political regimes which are just out to fulfill their egotistical interests (). Military machine is used to enforce cruel order and untold suffering to the citizen and mostly for those who are perceived as fence the ruling queen ().\r\nIn this movie we have seen that, in c ivil strife, many citizens usually dies, different maimed and the survivors have to live with fear, and in a suppressed political environment (). Many who survive these ordeals use films and new(prenominal) mass media tools to express what they are sacking finished and call for need to address their plight. Victims are the citizens epoch victimizers are politicians who fight to retain or get into power (). The film was an eye opener to what victims of coup have to undergo as selfish power hungry dictators fight to access or cohere on power.\r\nIt also pointed how influence from interested irrelevant government can bring hell on the life especially in politically volatile countries. The ‘Missing’ film describe how a south-America arena goes through change of political regime from civil to military regime led by unkind junta which caused gross human right violation (). The film explains well what civilians underwent in the 1973 coup the curfews, torture, kidnapp ings and ‘disappearance’ of those who voice out the suffering of the civilians ().\r\nThe visual cause of events during and after the coup as shown in the movie has a strong emotional impact to the witnesser that beat out explain and communicates human right violations and repression enforced by military. ‘Men with guns’ is an American political drama film compose and directed by put-on Sayles. Set is unrevealed South American country it’s a story about a man who discovers political events that were going on in his country (Men with guns). It was first released in Canada in 1997 and was take in Mexico. The plot of the movie start as Dr.\r\nFuentes (Federico Huppi) an old medical profession who had been teaching unsalted people to provide health care to free citizen in a country where small-scale agricultural communities struggle to make end meet (Ibid). He is described as being ignorant of political event in his country. After Dr. Fuentes he ard rumors that his former school-age childs are lost and possibly dead he decides to go and investigate the issue. Later Dr Fuentes discover that his student have been killed by ‘men with gun’ indicating that there has been people executing people who oppose them and pause them in the jungle (Men with guns).\r\nThis was done to repress the guerillas who where opposing the junta rule, as Dr Fuentes moved deeper into the hill, he teams up with Padre porillo ( a defrocked priest who lost his faith), Domingo (a poltroon from the ground forces), conejo (a boy who survive by stealing) and Graciela (a woman who off-key mute after she was raped). Dr Fuentes discovered that army officer were killing, torturing and raping those who were opposed to the military regime, especially five-year-old activist.\r\nDr Fuentes’s journey describes clearly the weight of damage to pay to bridge between not intimate and knowing, silence and acknowledgement assumption and truth (Men with guns). save like ‘Missing’, this film exposes repression and human right violation meted out to civilians by military regimes. The victims are still citizens who struggle for their life and standing for their rights, freedoms and beliefs. The film depicts political butt on during 1960 †80 where most Latin America countries experience revolution and military coups.\r\n contrasted the other, this film describes and emphasis the needs to find out what others in a country are going through. ‘Men with guns’ teaches us that although we are alone in our personal struggle to find information, freedom and right we are never alone in our coarse humanity struggle to freedom and rights. This is so on the doctor, the priest, the soldier, and the mute woman found themselves in aforesaid(prenominal) mission to get the truth and acknowledge it (Ibid). ‘The official story’ is another political thriller that revolves around story of a single f amily.\r\nDirected by Roger Ebert, it was first released in 1985 (The Official story). In the movie, Alicia is married to Robert, slopped, correctly man with government connection. They have take a girl. Alicia is ignorant of political situation in Argentina until Anna an old high school friend enters in her life (Ibid). Anna narrated to Alicia how her have sexr a leftist ‘disappeared’ and she was kidnapped and tortured. She later discovers what was going on when she came across demonstration by family member of a missing person ().\r\nShe began to project that her husband was part of repressive government and their pick out child may be stolen from a give who was a political prisoner (The Official story). Alicia meets an old woman who may be the grandmother of the adopted girl and they become close (Ibid). They found ability in each other. same(p) the ‘Men with guns’ the movie demonstrates that there could be offences being inflicted on other wh ile certain class or multitude of people are innocently unaware. In this film, army officer are killing leftists and those who are opposed to the government.\r\nThere is a gross violation of human rights and repression by government. The victims are the citizens who stand for their right. The movie clearly demonstrates how repressive regimes commit civil crime and mass murder without awareness, acknowledgement from the internal community. It vividly captures the political process that many Latin America counties went through in late 20h century (The Official story). ‘Of dear and Shadows’ is a political drama novel written by Isabel Allende. Isabel is a Chilean writer who is chairwoman Salvador Allende’s niece (Isabel, 42).\r\nThe book is a story of love and shadows of political commitment. The story centers on a daughter of a wealthy family and son of a Spanish exile with whom she becomes involved (Ibid, 32). Both of them, as a reporter and photographer, uncover ed a hideout crime that puts not only their love but also their life at risk. The book is set in a country under military dictatorship where arrest, disappearance and executions are rampant. Irene a reporter and Francisco a photographer are prepared to risk everything for the pastime of truth and justice.\r\nThey discovered crimes by the ruling military to those who opposed or undermine the military regime. At the end Irene, a daughter of a wealthy family which was backing the military regime and Francisco, son of a Marxist professor who was opposed to junta rule, are caught up in terror and violence (Ibid, 46). Like the triplet films, this book is about repressive regimes that was commonalty in many South American countries in the late 20th century . The victim are citizens who stand against the repression and human right violation.\r\nThis book demonstrates what majority of Latin American went through during revolution and political regimes coups. The novel helped to create awa reness of crimes that military regime and political tyrant inflicted on citizens and hence call for intervention. The book vividly describes physical, mental and psychological set up of crime and human right violation to soulfulness and society as whole. It shows that love can get across hate as the two passionate lovers position on despite what they go through (Isabel, 76). ‘ tike of dark’ is a diary written by Carolina Maria de Jesus in 1960.\r\nThe diary contains what Carolina went through in her life in a slum area of Sao Paulo, Brazil (Lavine, 24). The dairy contains what Carolina faced in her life as a fevelado (slum dweller) and political and social facts which were present during Carolina life. She writes how poverty and desperation caused people to compromise their dignity to get food (Ibid, 35). Carolina vividly describe the abominable life around her life, but despite these she go forth to have better life and gave her three children the best through writing (Lavine, 45).\r\nHer writing drew worry of politician who tried to involve agencies to give break to the poor, however these projected faded. This diary shows how government avoided the social welfare obligations to the poor citizens as they focus on upper income class welfare (Ibid, 84). In conclusion, the three films and the literature works where very important in advocating for the writes of the citizen and exposing violation by some government. The films demonstrated the political history of Latin America countries and political process they underwent to achieve democracy and political freedom.\r\n'