According to the Court , the pretend must be warned that they confuse the right to remain silent that any statements they brace may be used as cause against them that they have the right to an attorney and that if they cannot afford an attorney , one go step to the fore be app! ointed for them prior to any questioning if they so desire (Miranda v . Arizona , 384 U .S . 436 . Any inference obtained in violation of these principles shall not be admissible in court in accordance with the exclusionary rule . This being so , the evidence cannot be used against the accused (West s Encyclopedia of American LawWaiver of the Miranda rights must be made knowingly and intelligently and should the peculiar invoke his right to counsel to be present during the interrogation , the police officers must cease the questioningReferencesMiranda v . Arizona , 384 U .S . 436 . Retrieved on February 23 , 2008 , from HYPERLINK hypertext transfer protocol /caselaw .lp .findlaw .com /scripts /getcase .pl ?court US vol 384 invol 436 http /caselaw .lp .findlaw .com /scripts /getcase .pl ?court US vol 384 invol 436West s Encyclopedia of American Law . The Gale adjudicate , Inc . 1998PAGEPAGE 1 RIGHT TO COUNSEL...If you want to get a sufficient essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment