The Trails And Imprisoment Of Paul

TRIALS AND IMPRISONMENTSaint capital of Minnesota : Freedom In Chains (Name (School (Professor (CourseSaint capital of Minnesota : assay and jailedThe great apostle had created m some(prenominal) enemies among the Jewish community in the res publica of Corinth (Harry Tajra , 1989 . The Jews in the area bought Paul forwards the roman letters proconsul Gallio of Achaia (All somewhat the Journey , 2008 . The charges were , as cited in the Book of Acts , chapter 18 , euphonys 12-17 , objective Paul before the proconsul of attempting to induce the people to traffic pattern their religion contrary to what is stated in their fair play (Tajra , 1989 . exclusively the proconsul a dance step threw out the reference , stating that the case does non concern facts rough a criminal offense (Tajra , 1989 . The Jews were accuse Paul of violations associate to the interpretations of their religious statutes , as cited in verse 14-16 of the same volume and chapter (Bible Gateway , 2008The instance of Gallio dismissing the case could be pictured as Gallio speaking at such a rapid pace that it did not afford the apostle any possibility to make his defense , or apologia , which was considered an integral vocalisation of the jurisprudence in Roman law (Tajra , 1989 . The objections raised as to the portrayal of the disaster involving Paul and Gallio are not valid (Rainer Reisner , 1998 . The procedure tail be deduced to what is called cognitio extra ordinem , affording the governor the right to accept any new charges to accepted and tried before him (Reisner , 1998The DefenseTertullus , the counsel bought by the High Priest Ananias , was called to expound on the case against the apostle (Acts 24 :1-2 (Bible Gateway 2008 . The charges accused Paul of inciting a dissension among the Israelites , and desecratio n of the temple (v .5-6 (Bible Gateway , 200! 8 The charges in shopping mall were a shame hodge podge of political and religious offenses , mixed in a sort of enigmatic fashion (Tajra 1989 .

But for the arrest of the proconsul , he was not awed or flabbergasted by the charges (Tajra , 1989The issue chiefly rested in the ambit of the Hebraical Law , and not the offense of any Roman law (Tajra , 1989 . The immediate kindling of the charges against Paul may have stemmed not from the absence of any criminal instance in Paul s do , as the apostle expounded in his defense before the Roman governor Felix (Acts 24 : 11-12 (Bible Gateway 2008 . One may assume that the proconsul had an acuate hatred of the Jews , a view that he shared with his comrade , noted philosopher Seneca (Reisner , 1998 . But in this uncover , the proconsul does recognize some(prenominal) of the Jew s points (Reisner , 1998The proconsul does recognize the legitimacy of the Jew s right to practice their beliefs , or religio legitima , just does not share in the sanctioning of the apostle and thus far is neutral to attacks of the Jews on their own people because of these religious practices (Reisner 1998 . alike , the proconsul , in acquitting Paul , recognized that the law that was being cited in indicting Paul was...If you want to get a full essay, stray it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper